Quick Navigation
I’ve been investing in Hong Kong tech ETFs for years, and if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that not all Hang Seng Tech ETFs are created equal. When someone asks me “which Hang Seng Tech ETF is best?”, my answer depends on what you value most: low fees, tight tracking, or dividends. Let me walk you through the top tickers — I’ve done the homework so you don’t have to.
The Main Contenders
There are three big players in the Hang Seng Tech ETF space in Hong Kong: the CSOP Hang Seng Tech Index ETF (ticker: 03033), the iShares Hang Seng Tech ETF (03067), and the Hang Seng Tech Index ETF from ChinaAMC (03088). A smaller one, the Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (03032), also exists but tends to be less liquid. I’ve personally owned 03033 and 03067, and I’ve watched the others from the sidelines.
| ETF | Issuer | Management Fee | Fund Size (approx) | Dividend Policy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03033 | CSOP | 0.99% | HKD 20B+ | Semi-annual |
| 03067 | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.99% | HKD 8B | Quarterly |
| 03088 | ChinaAMC | 0.90% | HKD 5B | Annual |
| 03032 | Hang Seng Investment | 0.80% | HKD 1.5B | None |
Fees: The Silent Killer of Returns
Fees eat into your returns, period. 03032 wins on paper with a 0.80% fee, but its tiny size means higher bid-ask spreads — you might lose more on the spread than you save in fees. I once compared 03033 and 03067: same fee (0.99%), but 03033 has a massive asset base, making it cheaper to trade. Don’t just look at the expense ratio; factor in total cost of ownership.
Tracking Error: How Close Is Close Enough?
Tracking error shows how well an ETF follows the Hang Seng Tech Index. In my experience, 03033 has the lowest tracking error — often under 0.1% annually. 03067 is close but tends to lag slightly due to sampling techniques. 03088 and 03032 have slightly higher tracking errors, partly because they’re smaller and rebalance less efficiently. If you want a pure index play, 03033 is your best bet.
Liquidity: Can You Get In and Out?
Liquidity matters — especially if you’re trading size. I remember trying to sell a decent chunk of 03032 mid-day and getting a terrible fill. 03033 is the most liquid, with a tight bid-ask spread of about 0.02%. 03067 is also decent, but spreads widen during volatile hours. For active traders, 03033 is the no-brainer.
Dividends: Do Tech ETFs Pay?
Tech stocks don’t usually pay high dividends, but these ETFs still distribute what they collect. 03067 pays quarterly — nice for cash flow. 03033 pays semi-annually, while 03088 pays annually. 03032 doesn’t distribute at all (accumulating). I personally prefer quarterly dividends because I reinvest them faster. But if you’re not bothered, 03033’s lower tracking error might outweigh the dividend frequency.
My Verdict: Which One to Pick
After years of holding different ETFs, here’s my honest take:
- For most investors: 03033 — best liquidity, lowest tracking error, decent dividends. It’s the market leader for a reason.
- If you want quarterly dividends: 03067 — slightly higher tracking error but regular income.
- If you’re a long-term buy-and-hold investor: 03088 — lower fee and acceptable tracking, but be mindful of the spread.
- Avoid: 03032 unless you have a specific reason (like hedging). The liquidity just isn’t there.
I personally stick with 03033. It’s boring but effective — exactly what an index investor needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
This article is based on my personal experience and publicly available data. Always do your own due diligence before investing.
Leave a Comment